PJS and YMA Court Delays Decision Threesome Injunction

yma psj court injunctionI am betting that Elton John and David Furnish are wishing right now that they never got this superinjunction.
What do you think?
What would of been a one day story has now turned into a cause for free speech and the media.
The court delayed a ruling today so they can make this a public hearing! Egads. It is going to be a blow up for sure.


Famous Celebrity Couple Injunction PJS and YMA 

Celebrity ‘threesome’ injunction: Judges delay new ruling on ‘PJS’ gagging order.

“We have come to the conclusion that the hearing should be heard in open court because there are issues to be debated which are in the public interest.”
Lord Justice Jackson
This is going to be like a public hanging now.  By trying to hide the story, now this case will make history and most likely change the law in the UK.
Also as a side note, googling “threesome” will never be the same after this. This story will pop up for years. Gotta love the “internets”. 

Media win right to report on celebrity injunction hearing

But Desmond Browne QC, for the celebrity claimant who has only been identified by the initials PJS, accused sections of the press of whipping up hostility to the courts.

A retrospective claim for damages would deny the claimant “the only form of relief that is worth having”, Browne told the hearing.

“The media, and I refer particularly to … the defendants and publishers of the Mail, have sought to ridicule the granting of the injunction,” he said.

One paper had printed a cut-out template for readers to send to their MPs demanding that restrictions on reporting the “celebrity threesome” be lifted.

“Not all the secrecy had escaped,” Browne added. “There has been no mainstream publication in this jurisdiction [England and Wales] that directly infringes the order.”

Celebrity threesome couple names revealed: Updates as judges decide if entertainer should be unmasked in injunction battle


I have to tell you, this is very true. I have been following this story since twitter went nuts with #superinjuntion, and this story is still not that easy to find with any details and names. That is why I started writing about it. I was frustrated at how much digging I had to do to find the details. I have been working online for over 15 years and know how to find things out. All the UK publications kept saying it was a big story and out everywhere in the US, but that is not true.
None of the “respectable” online magazine like EW, People, US magazine and those types of soft gossip businesses have published this story.
The National Enquirer published their story on Monday with zero follow up or more stories since. They are terrible online anyway. They have super old stories on their website and seem to rarely update online other then headlines for the week in their published version. I guess they want to keep their print side the main thing going for them. No blame there.

What Desmond Browne QC for PJS and YMA said it very true. Unless you care enough to spend a little time looking online this story is NOT headline news with the names of the people involved. Most people would do a few searches and give up I think. 

UPDATE: On April 18, Court of Appeal judges ruled that the injunction in England and Wales will be lifted on Wednesday, April 20, pending an appeal by Elton John and David Furnish.

[yop_poll id=”8″]

 

 

(Visited 237 times, 1 visits today)
Loading Facebook Comments ...

Speak Your Mind

*

twelve − one =

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Loading Disqus Comments ...